Table of Contents
What is the Skills Report?
The Skills Report helps administrators monitor skill growth across their school(s) by tracking student progress over time with a dynamic Momentum Score and Smart Groups. The report aggregates data across the schools you manage, making it easy to identify trends, celebrate successes, and uncover opportunities for additional support.
Rather than focusing on a single classroom, the Admin Skills Report provides school and district-wide insights while still allowing you to drill down into performance by grade, teacher, skill, or individual student.
How Skills Are Organized
To help you see both the big picture and the fine details, the report organizes skills into two levels. It starts with broad Skill Categories (e.g., “Capitalization”) and then breaks them down into the specific, foundational Skill Sub-Categories that make them up (e.g., “Capitalizing Holidays” and “Capitalizing Dates”).
How to Access the Skills Report
An active School or District Premium subscription is required to access the Admin Skills Report.
To access the report from the Premium Hub, navigate to:
Premium Reports → Skills Report
From there, you can filter and explore performance across the schools associated with your administrator account.
Navigating the Skills Report
The report is built around two main sections, each offering a unique way to analyze school and district-wide data.
Within each section, you can choose how you'd like to group the data.
(a) The Main Report Sections
Smart Groups: This is your high-level overview. It automatically organizes students, grades, teachers, or skills into actionable groups (like “Needs Support” or “Meeting Goal”) so you can quickly identify where additional attention may be needed.
2. Performance Breakdown: This is your detailed view. It provides a sortable table containing key performance metrics for a more granular analysis of student learning.
(b) Choosing Your Perspective
After selecting a report section, choose how you'd like to organize the data.
“By Skill”: Displays average performance across skills. This view is useful for identifying which writing concepts students across your school(s) are mastering and which may require additional support.
“By Grade”: Groups student results by grade level, making it easy to compare overall performance across grades.
“By Teacher”: Groups student results by teacher, allowing you to compare instructional outcomes across classrooms.
“By Student”: Displays individual student performance.
📌 Note: To improve report performance, the Student view is only available after selecting a specific teacher. Once a teacher has been selected, you'll be able to view individual student results for that teacher's classes.
(c) Filtering Your Data
Several filters allow you to customize the report.
Depending on your needs, you may filter by:
Timeframe
School
Grade
Teacher
Classroom
📌 Note: The report defaults to the current school year, but you may also choose All Time to include all available historical data.
Student-level filtering is unavailable until a specific teacher has been selected.
(d) Understanding Grouped Views
The report allows you to view results grouped by skill, grade, teacher, or student.
When you group by student, you see each student's individual results.
When you group by skill, grade, or teacher, students are combined, and the metrics displayed—such as Average Momentum Score and Average Questions Answered—represent averages across those students.
The calculation works the same way regardless of how the data is grouped:
Each student receives their own results based only on the questions that belong in that group.
The report averages those individual student results, with every student contributing equally to the average.
Only students who practiced during your selected timeframe are included, and only the questions answered during that timeframe contribute to the calculations.
Example: Grouping by Grade
Suppose the Grade 5 view shows that three students practiced during your selected timeframe.
Each student answered ten Grade 5 questions and received Momentum Scores of 90, 65, and 85, respectively.
The report averages those scores:
(90 + 65 + 85) ÷ 3 = 80
The Skill and Teacher groupings work the same way; the only difference is which questions are included for each student.
(e) How Answers Are Attributed
Every question answered remains connected to the class where the activity was completed.
This means student work is associated with the class's grade level and teacher at the time the work occurred—not the student's current grade or current teacher.
For example, if a student completes activities while enrolled in a fourth-grade class, those responses remain associated with Grade 4 and that teacher. If the student moves into a fifth-grade class the following year, their previous work will continue appearing when viewing Grade 4, while their new work will appear under Grade 5.
This historical approach ensures the report accurately reflects where learning occurred over time.
Understanding the Report's Metrics
(a) Momentum Score
(i) What is the Momentum Score?
Based on Quill's proprietary algorithm, the Momentum Score is the centerpiece of the report. It is a dynamic score that reflects a student's learning journey and is not just a basic percentage of questions answered correctly. The score is carefully calculated to reward accuracy—awarding a tiered number of points based on which attempt is correct—while also emphasizing recent growth by giving more weight to a student's latest work. To ensure fairness, it focuses purely on the target skill, meaning students are not penalized for unrelated mistakes such as spelling or punctuation.
(ii) How is the Momentum Score Different from Activity Scores?
The Activity-Level Score, as shown on other reports like the Activity Summary report, is a traditional percentage score based on the final outcome of an activity. It tells you the percentage of questions a student got correct, with a question being marked 'correct' even if it took multiple attempts to get the right answer. To learn more about how individual activities are graded, you can read this article: How does Quill grade activities?
In contrast, the Momentum Score provides a more dynamic picture of learning. It considers how a student arrives at an answer by awarding more points when they are correct on earlier attempts. Furthermore, the score gives more weight to a student's most recent practice, ensuring it reflects their current momentum and growth over time.
So while activity-level scores provide a static snapshot of correctness, the Momentum Score offers a broader, dynamic view of student progress. It helps teachers uncover patterns, identify strengths, address challenges, and celebrate meaningful growth over time.
(b) Skill Exposure
It’s important to see how much practice has gone into a skill alongside the Momentum Score so you can gauge how confident you should be in its accuracy. Low exposure means the score is based on limited data and may be less reliable, while higher exposure provides a stronger foundation for confidence.
Skill Exposure is determined by the number of questions answered for the selected skill category or sub-category:
Low Exposure (1-5 questions): Indicates minimal practice. A low confidence alert icon (⚠) will appear next to scores with low exposure.
Medium Exposure (6-14 questions): Reflects moderate practice and progress.
High Exposure (15+ questions): Demonstrates significant practice and commitment.
(c) Performance Trend
This metric provides a clear, actionable view of whether performance is improving, declining, or staying steady. It was designed to reduce noise from minor fluctuations by only displaying "Trending Up" or "Trending Down" when a meaningful change in the Momentum Score occurs.
While the Momentum Score shows a student's current level, the trend reveals their trajectory, allowing you to gain several key instructional insights:
A high Momentum Score with a "Trending Down" arrow is an early warning that a student is beginning to struggle, prompting you to check in.
A low Momentum Score with a "Trending Up" arrow is a powerful sign of progress and a perfect opportunity for encouragement.
A consistently low score with a steady or downward trend signals a clear and urgent need for intervention.
By using the Performance Trend, you can move from reactive to proactive support, tailoring your instruction to a student's learning trajectory, not just their latest score.
(d) Replay Rate
Quill allows students to replay activities to improve their score, and these replayed questions are always eligible to earn full points. The Replay Rate shows what percentage of a student's practice is from replayed questions. It is calculated by dividing the number of questions replayed by the total number of questions answered, providing critical insight into their effort and learning process.
By analyzing the Replay Rate in context, you can gain several key instructional insights:
It can show whether a student is genuinely putting in effort to improve or if they are struggling despite repeated attempts.
High Replay Rates paired with poor performance can signal the need for individual, in-person support, while consistent improvement after replays demonstrates persistence and growth.
It can also help identify students who may be excessively replaying the same questions to inflate their scores, allowing teachers to address this behavior.
By exposing this data, you can better tailor interventions, monitor effort, and ensure that replays are being used effectively as a pedagogical tool.
Customizing Your Report
Changing Your Momentum Score Goal
The Smart Groups are powered by a customizable Momentum Score Goal.
By default, the goal is set to 80, creating four Smart Groups:
Meeting Goal
Approaching Goal
Needs Support
Needs More Practice
To change the goal that powers your Smart Groups, click the "Change goal" button.
A modal will appear where you can set a new goal between 50 and 100. When you save, your Smart Groups will automatically update.
After saving, your Smart Groups will automatically update.
📌 Note: Your Momentum Score Goal only affects your personal Admin Skills Report. Changing the goal does not update Momentum Score Goals for teachers or other administrators within your school(s).
FAQs
Why can't I assign Targeted Practice from the Admin Skills Report?
Why can't I assign Targeted Practice from the Admin Skills Report?
The Admin Skills Report is designed to help administrators monitor student learning across their school(s).
Assigning Targeted Practice is currently available only within the teacher-level Skills Report, where teachers can assign activities directly to the students they support.
Why can't I view students until I select a teacher?
Why can't I view students until I select a teacher?
To improve report performance, student-level views are disabled until a specific teacher has been selected.
After selecting a teacher, you'll be able to explore individual student performance for that teacher's classes.
Why is a student's work still appearing under last year's grade?
Why is a student's work still appearing under last year's grade?
Student work always remains associated with the class where it was completed.
If a student completed activities in a fourth-grade class, those results will continue appearing under Grade 4 even after the student advances to Grade 5.
This historical record ensures the report accurately reflects where learning occurred.
Does changing my Momentum Score Goal affect teachers?
Does changing my Momentum Score Goal affect teachers?
No. Changing the Momentum Score Goal only updates your personal Admin Skills Report. It does not change Smart Group thresholds for teachers or other administrators.
If you would like to have the ability to update teachers’ Momentum Score Goals, please feel free to share your feedback here.
Can I compare this year's students to last year's students?
Can I compare this year's students to last year's students?
Yes. By combining the Grade and Timeframe filters, you can compare performance across different cohorts of students.
For example:
Grade 6 + Last School Year shows students who were in sixth grade during the previous school year.
Grade 6 + This School Year shows the current year's sixth-grade students.
These are different groups of students, allowing you to compare year-over-year performance for the same grade level.
Keep in mind that student work always remains associated with the class where it was completed. If an individual student moves from sixth grade to seventh grade, their previous work remains connected to their sixth-grade class and will continue to appear when viewing Grade 6 for that school year.
Can I follow the same cohort of students as they move from one grade to the next?
Can I follow the same cohort of students as they move from one grade to the next?
Yes. Because the Grade filter is based on the grade level of the classroom where the work was completed—not the student's current grade—you can follow the same cohort of students over multiple school years.
For example:
Grade 4 + Last School Year shows the work students completed while they were enrolled in fourth grade.
Grade 5 + This School Year shows the work completed by those same students after they moved into fifth grade.
Comparing these two views allows you to follow the same cohort of students over time and better understand how their performance changes from one school year to the next.
Keep in mind that student work always remains associated with the class where it was completed. As students advance through grades, their previous work stays connected to the grade and teacher where the learning occurred.
Have More Questions?
Please feel free to send a message to the Quill team using the green message bubble in the bottom-right corner of the screen or email support@quill.org.









